While I was taking a stroll around the park this lunchtime, and as usual checking up on my twitter feed a post caught my eye.  It was an interchange about the experts database that my institution provides and the question asked was “Why are no librarians on this?”.  I can’t say I was surprised.  While I’ve not tried here, at previous places of employ I have asked to be included on such a resource.  My enquiries have been met with a mixture of outright negativity in some cases, and in others bafflement.  “What”, the database maintainers asked, “Would a librarian have to offer?  These databases are for corporations and the media to track down people of interest!”

It’s dismissive, disinterested and disingenuous attitudes like this that result in a feeling for many librarians that they are simply an add on to an institution.  They’re just as, if not more so in some cases, qualified and experienced as the people they work alongside.  Their work ethic is often second to none, given the increasingly need to show a return on investment placed on them.  In most cases they serve on course and project committees across the institutions and are the life blood of the channels of cross departmental communications.  Quite frankly without them the institutions would find their operations arguably significantly compromised.  But is the sweat of their brow returned with a belief that librarians are at the heart of the research and education support agenda?

No.  So it is perhaps no surprise that this interplay on twitter reminded me of some thoughts I’d been having about loyalty – loyalty that is to one’s employer or organisation.  You chat to many (though not all) academics and what you hear is a fervent belief in the institutions or units that they work within.  They might not see eye-to-eye with every policy decision enacted by the organisation governance, and some policies might rankle but on the whole they speak with great affection and loyalty about their institutional homes.  For librarians in my experience this is not the same experience.

Don’t get me wrong, there are many aspects about the organisations I have worked with over the years that I have enjoyed and even respected on occasion.  I’ve had the opportunity to work with some wonderful students and staff.  But do I feel any loyalty to anywhere I’ve been employed?  No.  Not in the slightest.  What I do is a fair day’s work for a fair day’s pay.  It might sound a little mercenary, but I guess that’s the only way to respond to the environment within which I work.  It’s work for hire, nothing more.  Pay me and I’ll sell your brand and beliefs far and wide, just don’t expect me to be espousing them when I’m off the clock; I’ve better things to do with my time.

Is loyalty important, since librarians are doing their jobs ok?  Yes it is.  Loyal staff are more likely to work harder, stay in post longer and go that extra mile that they might otherwise feel disinclined to.  Everybody – institution and individuals – benefit from this.

Could institutions do better and are there institutions out there who do clasp librarians and other academic support staff more closely to their bosoms?  I’m sure of it, though I’ve yet to find myself in that happy circumstance.  Perhaps what is lacking is a culture not so much of belief in what librarians do by the other staff, but of understanding and appreciation.  Librarianship is at times an occupation that deals with some terribly monotonous work; but we do it and do it well so that others can be enabled and even enhanced in their own (arguably) more crucial work.

Maybe, just maybe, what might engender a little more loyalty in your library staff is if these academics once in a while just said “Thanks” to their librarians, because I know when someone says that to me – it just makes my day.


2 thoughts on “Loyalty

  1. I had an interesting conversation with my parents recently about organisational loyalty, discussing how the idea of ‘a job for life’ no longer exists, and how this means that, unlike their generation, ours has to think more strategically about their employment, not assuming that loyalty on our part will be rewarded by continuing employment (they’d actually disapproved of something my brother had done, which I thought was perfectly reasonable).

    I wonder if the position of the academic at the centre of Universities’ purpose, and particularly the importance of retaining certain big-name academics for the University, means that loyalty just makes more sense in an academic-institution relationship than in a librarian-institution relationship. I’d be certainly be curious to find out the typical length of time an academic vs. a librarian works for an institution.


    1. I think I’ve had the same conversation with my parental units (and my outlaws too) – they’re just shocked that you can even think of jumping from job to job like I’ve done over the years.

      Gotta agree with the idea that loyalty isn’t rewarded by continued employment – I’ve seen this happen to various staff over the years, a sad reflection of the balance sheet over people. I guess cuts are going to fall somewhere, but where’s the quid pro quo eh?

      It’s my impression that academics stay much longer in post than librarians – those at a professional level; although I keep meeting senior professionals who’ve worked in the same place for decades. Horrific – I just can’t imagine being at the same place for that long – you never learn new systems, never really get out of your comfort zone, and never perhaps appreciate the transience of the working experience.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s